Content
42%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured but largely conceptual GOAP role-prompt: it explains planning concepts Claude already knows and gives abstract methodology rather than executable guidance. The only code is non-executable pseudo-MCP calls, limiting actionability despite a clear sequenced workflow.
Suggestions
Replace abstract capability descriptions with concrete, executable guidance: define the state representation format, show a real A*/GOAP planning code snippet, and give a worked example of decomposing a goal into an action sequence.
Cut conceptual padding Claude already knows (what GOAP/A*/preconditions are, the OODA explanation) and the fluff phrases like 'discovers novel solutions through creative action composition'.
Add explicit validation checkpoints to the workflow (e.g., verify preconditions hold before executing an action, confirm the resulting state matches the goal) instead of only a conceptual replanning step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body restates concepts Claude already knows (GOAP, A* search, preconditions, OODA) and includes fluff such as 'discovers novel solutions through creative action composition', but it is organized into sections rather than a wall of text, so it is mostly efficient but could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is almost entirely abstract ('Use A* pathfinding to search through possible action sequences') with no state representation, planning algorithm, or executable GOAP code; the only code block uses non-executable pseudo-MCP notation with placeholder values, so it describes rather than instructs. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step methodology with a conceptual OODA loop and a replanning feedback step is present, but there are no concrete validation checkpoints or error-recovery specifics, leaving the sequence conceptual with implicit rather than explicit checkpoints. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are referenced; the skill is self-contained and organized into clear sections (capabilities, methodology, MCP examples) with no nested or broken references, satisfying the well-organized self-contained exception. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |