CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

agent-sync-coordinator

Agent skill for sync-coordinator - invoke with $agent-sync-coordinator

39

1.61x
Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

87%

1.61x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

12%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a verbose, repetitive monolith built around placeholder pseudocode and corrupted paths, offering little executable guidance and no progressive disclosure. Its only structural merit is a loose multi-step sequence, which lacks the validation checkpoints batch synchronization requires.

Suggestions

Collapse the repeated swarm_init/agent_spawn blocks into one reusable snippet and remove the inflated metrics/marketing prose to respect token budget.

Replace placeholder content ('[aligned package.json]', '[synchronized content]') and fix the corrupted '$'-delimited paths with real, executable examples or a single concrete worked example.

Add explicit validation checkpoints (e.g. run tests, verify version alignment, rollback on failure) as a validate-fix-retry loop around the batch sync workflow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is padded with near-identical swarm_init/agent_spawn blocks repeated four or more times, placeholder-laden pseudocode, and inflated metrics prose, explaining coordination concepts and restating tool lists Claude already understands.

1 / 3

Actionability

Code examples are dominated by non-executable placeholders like '[aligned package.json]', '[synchronized content]', and '[GitHub modes documentation]', and file paths appear corrupted (using '$' instead of '/'), so nothing is copy-paste ready.

1 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A rough sequence (read state, branch, push files, run tests) is present, but batch multi-repository sync operations lack explicit validation checkpoints or validate-fix-retry feedback loops, capping clarity at 2.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the skill is a monolithic single-file wall of text with no overview-to-detail split or external references for navigation.

1 / 3

Total

5

/

12

Passed

Description

7%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is essentially a placeholder invocation label rather than a meaningful capability statement, omitting both concrete actions and usage triggers. It identifies a domain but does not communicate what the skill does or when to invoke it.

Suggestions

Rewrite the description to name concrete actions, e.g. 'Aligns versions and synchronizes dependencies across multiple repositories and coordinates cross-package integration PRs.'

Add an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause listing natural terms users would say, such as 'Use when synchronizing package versions, resolving cross-repo dependency drift, or coordinating multi-package releases.'

Drop the 'Agent skill for ... - invoke with $...' framing from the user-facing description and keep only the capability and trigger language.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description only states 'Agent skill for sync-coordinator' with no concrete actions named; it identifies a domain but describes nothing the skill actually does.

1 / 3

Completeness

Neither a clear 'what' (actions are unspecified) nor any 'when to use' trigger is provided, so it fails both halves of the completeness requirement.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

'invoke with $agent-sync-coordinator' is an invocation mechanism rather than a natural keyword a user would say, and no task-oriented trigger terms are present.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'sync-coordinator' names a somewhat niche coordination domain, but the description offers no distinct triggers that would prevent it from overlapping with other coordination or sync skills.

2 / 3

Total

5

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
ruvnet/claude-flow
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.