CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

agent-v3-queen-coordinator

Agent skill for v3-queen-coordinator - invoke with $agent-v3-queen-coordinator

48

6.25x
Quality

21%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

100%

6.25x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/agent-v3-queen-coordinator/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

35%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a reasonably concise high-level orchestration plan with clear phases, but it offers no executable coordination guidance and lacks validation checkpoints for multi-agent work. It also carries buzzword padding and time-sensitive version data that should be isolated.

Suggestions

Add concrete, executable guidance for how the coordinator actually dispatches and tracks agents (commands, scripts, or status-check procedures) instead of only a phase table.

Introduce validation checkpoints and feedback loops for each phase (e.g., verify agent task completion before advancing) to lift workflow clarity.

Move the time-sensitive version "3.0.0-alpha", updated date, and week-by-week timeline into a clearly labeled section or reference file, and trim buzzword taglines like "Complete Reimagining".

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly structured and dense (agent assignments, weeks, metrics) but carries buzzword padding like "Complete Reimagining" and emoji-laden headers, plus time-sensitive version/timeline data not isolated in a deprecated section, so it is efficient but could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

The content describes topology, phases, and targets rather than giving executable coordination commands or code; the only shell snippets live in the YAML hooks config, not as actionable guidance for using the skill.

1 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Phases 1-4 are sequenced with week ranges and agent assignments, but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops for the multi-agent coordination work, so checkpoints are missing or implicit.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is organized into clear sections but is a single inline overview with no bundle files or one-level-deep references signaled, so material that could be split out stays inline.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Description

7%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is essentially a label plus an invocation token; it conveys almost no capability detail and no natural-use triggers. It fails to tell a user or Claude what the skill does or when to invoke it.

Suggestions

Replace the generic label with concrete actions the coordinator performs (e.g., orchestrate a 15-agent swarm, manage GitHub issues, sequence ADR implementation).

Add an explicit "Use when..." clause listing natural trigger terms users would say, such as multi-agent coordination, swarm orchestration, or parallel agent dispatch.

Drop the "$agent-v3-queen-coordinator" invocation token from the description and keep it as trigger-language phrasing instead.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description states only "Agent skill for v3-queen-coordinator"; it names a domain but lists no concrete actions, matching the vague/abstract anchor rather than the action-naming level above.

1 / 3

Completeness

It neither explains what the skill concretely does nor gives any "Use when..." trigger, so both what and when are missing or very weak.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The only trigger guidance is "invoke with $agent-v3-queen-coordinator", a command token rather than natural keywords a user would say, so it falls at the no-natural-keywords level.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming the specific skill "v3-queen-coordinator" gives it a niche, but the phrasing is generic enough that it could overlap with other agent skills, matching the somewhat-specific anchor.

2 / 3

Total

5

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
ruvnet/claude-flow
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.