Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured but abstract role prompt: it tells Claude what a base template generator should care about without providing concrete templates, code, or validation steps. Organization is good; executable guidance is the main gap.
Suggestions
Add at least one copy-paste-ready template example (e.g. a minimal React component or API endpoint scaffold) so the guidance is actionable rather than descriptive.
Tighten generic filler such as 'Follow SPARC methodology principles when applicable' and the final closing paragraph, which restate points already covered.
If templates vary by category, either show a concrete starter for the most common one inline or point to a bundled reference file with the rest.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient sectioned guidance, but phrases like 'always consider the broader project context, existing patterns, and future extensibility needs' and 'Follow SPARC methodology principles when applicable' are generic padding that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives high-level hints ('Include proper TypeScript definitions, error handling, and documentation structure') with no concrete code, commands, or template examples, so Claude lacks specific executable steps. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A six-step 'template generation approach' provides a sequence, but the steps are abstract ('Analyze Requirements', 'Apply Best Practices') with no validation checkpoints or feedback loops. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a single short file (~35 lines) with no external references needed, organized under clear section headers, matching the simple-skill exception for well-organized content under 50 lines. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |