Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-structured grounding skill with a clear sequenced workflow, an explicit validation step, and a feedback loop for re-observation. The only gap is the absence of executable code/commands, which is acceptable for an instruction-only skill but keeps actionability just below the top.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries instruction, matching the anchor-5 example of assuming competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present ("read each named fact live, read-only", "no write, no state-changing call", invoke clarify/draft/judge, return "two lists of short bullets"), but as an instruction-only skill it lacks executable code/commands, leaving minor gaps versus anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The observe → draft → judge sequence is explicit with a validation checkpoint (judge verdict) and a feedback loop ("a re-observation, or an amendment re-enters the snapshot, and the snapshot gets judged again"), matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, organized into two clearly labeled sections (## Observe, ## The snapshot); per the simple-skills note this scores 5 with well-organized sections and no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |