Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction skill that assumes competence and gives concrete, sequenced guidance. Its main gap is the absence of a concrete mechanism and an internal validation checkpoint for the live quiz deliverable.
Suggestions
Provide one concrete snippet or pattern for the hidden-until-commit quiz feedback (e.g., a minimal JS/HTML pattern) to lift actionability toward 5.
Add an explicit build-time validation checkpoint before opening the file (e.g., 'verify every question has feedback on all options, then open it') to strengthen workflow_clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense — 'cut what no quiz question needs,' 'One idea per section,' 'three rows and one duplicate' — with no padding and no explaining of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is strong ('YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.html', 'open <path>', exact section order, per-option feedback mechanics) but the live hidden-until-commit quiz has no concrete rendering mechanism, a minor gap for the core deliverable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-section ordered sequence with an externalized pass-check ('Invite the reader to pass before acting on it'), but no explicit internal build-time validation checkpoint (e.g., verify every option has feedback before opening). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under-50-line instruction skill with no external references needed; the body is a compact, well-organized overview with labeled sections, meeting the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |