Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally token-efficient instruction-only skill: concrete routing rules with named tool invocations and a clear loop, organized appropriately for its size. The only real gaps are the unspecified method behind the initial lookup step and implicit rather than explicit validation of the final work order.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 16-line body is telegraphic with zero padding: no concept explanations, no restatements, and every line either routes, asks, or states an output, fitting the lean-and-efficient top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete condition-to-skill routing rules, named tool invocations ("invoking the named skill with the Skill tool", "with AskUserQuestion"), and an explicit output spec ("the ask, the bar it must meet, and what it must NOT do") make this mostly executable; the opening instruction "Look up what the record, the repo, or the world can answer" gives no method or tools, a minor gap that keeps it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (lookup → route → re-route → ask open questions → deepen → state work order → shape) is clear and includes an explicit termination loop ("Route again until nothing is left to invent"), but validation checkpoints are implicit and some transitions are compressed, matching the most-checkpoints-present anchor rather than the explicit-validation anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At 16 lines with no bundle files and no content that warrants external references, the body's paragraph-and-bullet organization fully satisfies structure and navigation; per the rubric's simple-skill guideline, this can score 5 without headers or reference files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |