CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

router

Spawn agents and verify their output — route work, never do it. Use when the work splits into pieces agents can carry and the session should route and check, not execute.

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exceptionally tight behavioral skill: every line is directive, the routing loop is sequenced with an explicit verification checkpoint, and the reporting format plus stop conditions are fully specified. The only gap is that failure handling — what happens when a piece fails verification — is left implicit.

Suggestions

Add one clause to step 2 or 3 stating what happens when a return fails verification (e.g. redispatch the piece with what the check found, or mark it failed in the report) so the feedback loop is explicit.

Consider a one-line example of the report bullet format (e.g. "- lib/build.ts — verified and settled") to make the output spec copy-paste concrete.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Phrases like "Each agent starts blind" and "An agent's summary is what it intended, not what it did — read what it produced" carry maximal guidance per token; nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. Matches anchor 5 (lean, every token earns its place) with nothing trimmable.

5 / 5

Actionability

Instruction-only skill with fully concrete directives: exact prompt contents ("the piece's goal, the constraints, why it matters, and what is out of scope"), dispatch batching ("Independent pieces dispatch together, in one message"), exact reporting vocabulary ("verified and settled" / "unverified and open"), and enumerated stop conditions. Fully executable guidance covering the common cases, matching anchor 5.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The numbered loop has a clear sequence and an explicit validation checkpoint ("Nothing reaches the user unverified", plus the merged-tree check) with a defined end condition. Not 5 because the recovery path when a return fails verification is never stated — whether to redispatch or fix is left implicit, and per guidelines only what is written is scored.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

At ~15 lines with no external references needed, the skill qualifies for the simple-skill exception: well-organized sections (stance bullets, numbered loop, reporting spec, edge cases) with a single clearly signaled one-level-deep pointer ("use **target** skill"). Easy to navigate, nothing that belongs in a separate file.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A lean, two-sentence description that clearly states what the skill does and when to use it, with concrete action verbs and a natural trigger clause. Its main limitation is modest trigger-term breadth — common synonyms for delegation/orchestration are absent and the when-clause is partly self-referential rather than externally concrete.

Suggestions

Add natural trigger synonyms users would say, e.g. "Use when the user asks to delegate, parallelize, or fan out work across subagents".

Make the when-clause reference external cues rather than restating the skill — e.g. "Use when a task arrives as multiple independent pieces (files to fix, bugs to triage, options to compare) that agents can carry in parallel".

Consider naming one or two additional concrete actions (e.g. writing dispatch prompts, merging verified results) to round out the what-clause toward comprehensive coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names three concrete actions — "Spawn agents and verify their output — route work, never do it" — matching anchor 4 (several specific actions, minor gaps). Not 5 because coverage isn't comprehensive (no mention of dispatch composition, merging, or escalation); not 3 because it goes beyond 1-2 actions.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what ("Spawn agents and verify their output — route work, never do it") and when ("Use when the work splits into pieces agents can carry..."). Not 5 because the when-clause "the session should route and check, not execute" partly restates the skill rather than giving fully concrete external triggers.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural orchestration terms — "spawn", "agents", "route", "verify", "work splits into pieces" — giving good keyword coverage per anchor 4. Not 5 because common variations users say ("delegate", "parallelize", "subagents", "fan out", "orchestrate") are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Route work, never do it" carves a clear niche, but the trigger condition could overlap with closely related agent-orchestration and workflow skills, matching anchor 4 (mostly distinct, minor overlap risk).

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

saadshahd/moo.md

Path

hope/skills/router/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.