Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured lifecycle orchestrator: lean, imperative, with explicit phase gates, a validation feedback loop, and disciplined progressive disclosure to a single real reference file. The only weak spot is slight redundancy in the cross-reference and closing summary.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | At 167 lines (under the 200 budget) the body is imperative and assumes competence, with only minor repetition (the plugin-craft cross-reference and the closing summary could be trimmed) keeping it off a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands (`dora review ... --format json`, `npx @hacksmith/doraval`), an exact frontmatter template, and specific paths; minor gaps in full runnable examples for the optimize loop keep it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A phase table, explicit phase gates between every transition, and a dora validate→fix→re-run-until-exit-0 feedback loop plus a boxed quality checklist give clear sequencing with validation and error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body stays a lean overview and consistently delegates heavy material to the one-level-deep, existing `references/skill-craft-methodology.md` via the canonical `> For ... load references/...` blockquote, making navigation easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |