Provides CI/CD pipeline configuration using GitHub Actions for Golang projects. Covers testing, linting, SAST, security scanning, code coverage, Dependabot, Renovate, GoReleaser, code review automation, and release pipelines. Use this whenever setting up CI for a Go project, configuring workflows, adding linters or security scanners, setting up Dependabot or Renovate, automating releases, or improving an existing CI pipeline. Also use when the user wants to add quality gates to their Go project.
86
85%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates specific capabilities, includes abundant natural trigger terms, explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it, and occupies a well-defined niche. It follows the third-person voice convention and avoids vague language or buzzwords.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: testing, linting, SAST, security scanning, code coverage, Dependabot, Renovate, GoReleaser, code review automation, and release pipelines. These are all concrete, identifiable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (CI/CD pipeline configuration with specific tools for Golang) and 'when' (explicit 'Use this whenever...' clause listing multiple trigger scenarios like setting up CI, configuring workflows, adding linters, automating releases, and adding quality gates). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'CI/CD', 'GitHub Actions', 'Go project', 'workflows', 'linters', 'security scanners', 'Dependabot', 'Renovate', 'releases', 'CI pipeline', 'quality gates'. These are all terms a user would naturally use when requesting this kind of help. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive by combining two specific niches: GitHub Actions CI/CD AND Golang projects. The mention of Go-specific tools like GoReleaser further narrows the scope. Unlikely to conflict with generic CI skills or generic Go development skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured CI/CD skill that serves effectively as a comprehensive overview document with good progressive disclosure to asset files. Its main weakness is that actionability depends heavily on external asset files (none provided in the bundle), so the skill body itself contains relatively little copy-paste-ready code. The content is mostly concise but could be tightened in several sections, particularly the Docker and dependency management areas.
Suggestions
Include at least one complete, minimal workflow YAML inline (e.g., the test workflow) so the skill is actionable even without bundle files, then reference assets for more complex variants.
Tighten the Docker section by removing explanatory bullets that Claude can infer (e.g., 'QEMU + Buildx: Required for multi-platform builds') and consolidating security warnings into a single concise block.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient and avoids explaining basic concepts Claude already knows. However, some sections are verbose — the Docker key details bullet list, the Renovate advantages list, and the security warnings could be tightened. The Quick Reference table is excellent for density, but the overall document is quite long with some redundant explanations (e.g., explaining what govulncheck does, what CodeQL query suites are). | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill references concrete workflow files (e.g., `see [test.yml](./assets/test.yml)`) and provides specific flags and commands, but the actual workflow YAML content is in external asset files that are not provided in the bundle. The inline content gives good guidance (test flags, version matrix patterns, the Common Mistakes table) but lacks executable, copy-paste-ready code blocks — most concrete content is delegated to assets we cannot verify exist. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The skill clearly sequences the pipeline stages (test → lint → security → release) in Setup mode, and provides an audit-then-patch approach for Improve mode. Validation checkpoints are present: `-race` flag, `git diff --exit-code` for mod tidy, coverage thresholds, security scanning before release. The Common Mistakes table serves as an effective checklist. Security warnings with explicit guards and branch protection requirements demonstrate strong feedback-loop thinking. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well-structured as an overview document with clear one-level-deep references to asset files (test.yml, lint.yml, security.yml, etc.) and reference documents (repo-security.md). Each section provides enough context to understand the purpose before pointing to the detailed file. Related skills are listed at the end. Navigation is straightforward with the Quick Reference table serving as a map. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
e9761db
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.