Golang data structures — slices (internals, capacity growth, preallocation, slices package), maps (internals, hash buckets, maps package), arrays, container/list/heap/ring, strings.Builder vs bytes.Buffer, generic collections, pointers (unsafe.Pointer, weak.Pointer), and copy semantics. Use when choosing or optimizing Go data structures, implementing generic containers, using container/ packages, unsafe or weak pointers, or questioning slice/map internals.
76
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that thoroughly enumerates specific Go data structure topics, includes abundant natural trigger terms that developers would use, and provides an explicit 'Use when...' clause. It is highly distinctive and would be easy for Claude to correctly select from a large pool of skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description lists multiple specific concrete actions and topics: slices with internals/capacity growth/preallocation, maps with internals/hash buckets, arrays, container packages, strings.Builder vs bytes.Buffer, generic collections, pointers with unsafe.Pointer and weak.Pointer, and copy semantics. This is highly specific and comprehensive. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (Golang data structures with detailed enumeration of topics) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause covering choosing/optimizing Go data structures, implementing generic containers, using container packages, unsafe/weak pointers, or questioning slice/map internals. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms a Go developer would use: 'slices', 'maps', 'capacity growth', 'preallocation', 'strings.Builder', 'bytes.Buffer', 'unsafe.Pointer', 'weak.Pointer', 'generic collections', 'container/list/heap/ring', 'copy semantics', 'slice/map internals'. These are terms developers naturally use when asking about Go data structures. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with a clear niche: Go-specific data structures. The mention of Go-specific types (slices, maps package, container/list/heap/ring, unsafe.Pointer, weak.Pointer) and Go-specific concepts (capacity growth, preallocation) makes it very unlikely to conflict with skills for other languages or other Go topics like concurrency or networking. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted reference skill that efficiently covers Go data structures with concrete code examples, clear selection guidance, and good organizational structure. It excels at conciseness by using tables for quick reference and avoiding unnecessary explanations. The main weakness is that the referenced deep-dive files are not provided in the bundle, making it impossible to verify the progressive disclosure structure actually works end-to-end.
Suggestions
Provide the referenced bundle files (slice-internals.md, map-internals.md, containers.md, generics.md, pointers.md) to fully support the progressive disclosure structure
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient throughout. It assumes Claude's Go competence, avoids explaining basic concepts, and every section delivers actionable information without padding. Tables are used effectively for quick reference, and cross-references to other skills avoid duplicating content. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides executable Go code examples for preallocation, generic sets, arrays as map keys, and slices.Grow. The best practices summary gives concrete, specific guidance (e.g., exact growth formula, specific package functions). The common mistakes table pairs each mistake with a concrete fix. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is primarily a reference/selection skill rather than a multi-step workflow skill. The decision guidance is clear: when to use each data structure, which package to choose, and what to avoid. The best practices are numbered and unambiguous. For a reference-oriented skill, the sequencing and structure are appropriate. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references multiple deep-dive files (slice-internals.md, map-internals.md, containers.md, generics.md, pointers.md) and cross-references other skills, which is good structure. However, no bundle files were provided, so we cannot verify these references exist. The references are one-level deep and clearly signaled, but the inability to confirm their existence and the reliance on unverifiable paths prevents a top score. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
8c7e016
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.