Comprehensive documentation guide for Golang projects, covering godoc comments, README, CONTRIBUTING, CHANGELOG, Go Playground, Example tests, API docs, and llms.txt. Use when writing or reviewing doc comments, documentation, adding code examples, setting up doc sites, or discussing documentation best practices. Triggers for both libraries and applications/CLIs.
92
92%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its scope (Go documentation), lists specific artifacts and actions, and includes explicit trigger guidance. It uses third-person voice appropriately and covers both the 'what' and 'when' dimensions well. The Go-specific terminology provides excellent distinctiveness from other potential documentation skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions and artifacts: godoc comments, README, CONTRIBUTING, CHANGELOG, Go Playground, Example tests, API docs, and llms.txt. These are clearly defined documentation types rather than vague references. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (comprehensive documentation guide covering godoc comments, README, CONTRIBUTING, CHANGELOG, etc.) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when writing or reviewing doc comments, documentation, adding code examples, setting up doc sites, or discussing documentation best practices'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'doc comments', 'documentation', 'code examples', 'doc sites', 'documentation best practices', 'godoc', 'README', 'CONTRIBUTING', 'CHANGELOG', 'libraries', 'applications/CLIs'. Good coverage of terms a Go developer would naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clearly scoped to Golang documentation specifically, with distinct triggers like 'godoc', 'Go Playground', 'Example tests', and 'llms.txt'. The Go-specific terminology makes it unlikely to conflict with general documentation or other language documentation skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, comprehensive documentation skill with excellent progressive disclosure and actionability. The 10-step workflow provides clear sequencing, and references to detailed sub-documents keep the main file navigable. Minor verbosity in the persona section and some explanatory text could be trimmed, but overall the skill is effective and well-organized.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly well-organized but includes some unnecessary explanation (e.g., 'Good documentation makes code discoverable, understandable, and maintainable' and general truisms about documentation). The persona/modes section adds overhead. The CalculateDiscount example is quite long for illustrating doc comment format. However, most content is substantive and not egregiously padded. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete, executable examples throughout: full doc comment format with Go code, exact badge markdown, specific bash commands for installation, a complete README section order, and references to copy-paste templates. The checklist table and API documentation table give specific tool recommendations. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 10-step sequential workflow is clearly numbered and logically ordered, starting with project type detection and progressing through increasingly specific documentation layers. The checklist table in Step 2 serves as a validation checkpoint. The parallelization guidance for sub-agents is explicit. While there aren't traditional validate-fix-retry loops, documentation writing doesn't involve destructive operations that would require them. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent progressive disclosure: the main skill provides a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to separate files (references/library.md, references/application.md, references/code-comments.md, references/project-docs.md, and asset templates). Each reference is contextually placed at the relevant step. Cross-references to related skills are clearly noted at the top. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
b88f91d
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.