Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is an efficient, highly actionable reference: executable Go examples for every primitive, a useful dig-vs-fx decision table, explicit validation guidance, and well-structured offloading of advanced/recipes/testing topics to real referenced files. Slight tightening of prose would push conciseness to a 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dig-specific, assuming Go competence (e.g. tight Provide/Invoke snippets, the dig-vs-fx comparison table, numbered Best Practices), with only minor prose that could be trimmed; it sits just above the score-3 'mostly efficient' anchor but not at the fully lean score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, executable Go throughout — dig.New(), Provide/Invoke, dig.In with optional/name/group tags, dig.Out, dig.Name, dig.As, value groups with flatten, and a full main() example — covering the common wiring cases, matching the fully-executable score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Full Application Example and Best Practices give a clear create→provide→invoke sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint ('Validate the graph eagerly in tests ... DryRun(true)'), but the skill is reference-shaped rather than a single guarded multi-step process, so it lands at 'clear sequence with most checkpoints' rather than the score-5 feedback-loop anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that pushes depth to one-level-deep, real bundle files (references/advanced.md, recipes.md, testing.md), each clearly signaled via inline links, a Further Reading list, and a Cross-References section, giving easy navigation that matches the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |