Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a model of a concise, actionable process skill: a strict test-first workflow with explicit fail/pass verification checkpoints, executable pytest commands, an escape hatch with user confirmation, and a closing checklist. It assumes Claude's knowledge and wastes no tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what TDD or pytest is, and every section (When to Use, Workflow, Conventions, Commands, escape hatch, Checklist) earns its tokens, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands ('pytest tests/test_foo.py::test_bar -v', 'pytest --cov=src', 'source .venv/bin/activate') covering the common run cases, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A strict-ordered four-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (verify fail, then verify pass), an error-recovery feedback loop via the 'When a Test Is Not Reasonable' section requiring user confirmation, and a final checklist — exactly the top anchor, and validation is present so the destructive/batch cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the single-purpose skill is just over 50 lines but well-organized into clear, navigable section headers with no nested references or inlined bulk content, satisfying the simple-skill exception for well-organized structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |