Advises on rollback strategies by analyzing what a deploy changes — recommending revert, roll-forward, feature-flag kill, or data repair depending on reversibility. Use during an incident when a deploy went bad, when designing a deploy pipeline and the user asks how to make it reversible, or when a migration needs an undo plan.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:santosomar/general-secure-coding-agent-skills --skill rollback-strategy-advisor97
Quality
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that excels across all dimensions. It provides specific concrete actions (revert, roll-forward, feature-flag kill, data repair), includes natural trigger terms users would actually say during incidents or deployment planning, and explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it with three distinct trigger scenarios.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'analyzing what a deploy changes', 'recommending revert, roll-forward, feature-flag kill, or data repair', and mentions 'reversibility' as a decision factor. These are concrete, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Advises on rollback strategies by analyzing what a deploy changes — recommending revert, roll-forward, feature-flag kill, or data repair') AND when ('Use during an incident when a deploy went bad, when designing a deploy pipeline and the user asks how to make it reversible, or when a migration needs an undo plan'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'rollback', 'deploy', 'incident', 'revert', 'roll-forward', 'feature-flag', 'migration', 'undo plan', 'reversible', 'deploy pipeline'. Good coverage of terms across incident response and deployment planning contexts. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused specifically on rollback/revert strategies for deployments. The combination of incident response, deploy pipeline design, and migration undo planning creates a distinct scope unlikely to conflict with general deployment or incident skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent skill that provides highly actionable guidance for a complex domain. The reversibility classification table and decision tree are particularly strong, giving Claude clear criteria for choosing strategies. The worked example demonstrates practical application, and the 'Do not' section provides important guardrails. Minor improvement possible in progressive disclosure for longer reference materials.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section earns its place with no unnecessary explanations of basic concepts. The tables are dense with information, the decision tree is compact, and there's no padding or verbose introductions. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands (`kubectl rollout undo`, `pg_dump`), specific SQL patterns, exact output formats, and a complete worked example. The decision tree gives explicit paths to follow. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The decision tree provides clear sequencing, the data repair section has explicit numbered steps with validation (snapshot before repair), and the worked example demonstrates the full decision process with checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized with clear sections, but it's a moderately long single file. The reference to `cd-pipeline-generator` suggests related skills exist but navigation to them isn't clearly structured. Could benefit from splitting design-time vs incident-mode into separate files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.