Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered, lean workflow for an agentic browser task: clear phases, strong verification discipline around submission, and appropriate safety constraints stated as rules rather than explanations. The only notable gap is that references/evaluation.md is not signposted from the body, and a worked draft example would push actionability to the top.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; nearly every sentence encodes a portal-specific fact or constraint. A few long, hedged sentences (e.g., "do not repeat approval already given unless the content, data, destination, or a host-required confirmation changes") could be trimmed, matching the efficient-with-minor-trimming anchor rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is highly executable: a copy-ready draft template with named fields, concrete portal controls ("Nuevo reporte", "Mis reportes"), and a fixed status vocabulary ("Borrador", "Registrado", "Envío no confirmado"). It stays at 4 rather than 5 because there is no worked example of a filled draft or Spanish description text, leaving minor gaps for the most common case. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four phases (Choose mode → Gather and draft → Prepare the portal → Submit and verify) are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: read back filled values, treat a click/spinner/HTTP success as non-evidence, report "Envío no confirmado" on ambiguity, and inspect "Mis reportes" before any retry with no duplicate submission. This matches the top anchor with error-recovery loops; the destructive/batch cap does not apply because validation is thorough. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Three of the four bundle files (portal.md, sessions.md, runtimes.md) are one level deep and clearly signaled with when-to-read conditions. However, references/evaluation.md is never referenced or linked from the body, so navigation to it relies on discovery alone — a minor organization gap that keeps this below the well-signaled, complete top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |