Conciseness

The body is ~45 lean lines with zero concept explanations (no git tutorials, no CLI background); every sentence adds a rule, a command, or a decision point (e.g., "If the user seems unfamiliar with git, keep the vocabulary plain"). Nothing could be cut without losing information, matching the top anchor.

Actionability

Every step ships copy-paste-ready commands (`git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree`, `git init -b main`, `origin repo create <name>`, `git push -u origin main`) with inline conditionals as comments. Common cases are covered including the taken-name retry rule and the report URL format, matching the fully-executable top anchor.

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced 1-2-3 workflow with explicit validation checkpoints: inspect remotes before creating anything ("Never create a second repo"), review staged files and `.gitignore`/secrets before committing ("never stage-and-push blind"), and an error-recovery feedback loop (name taken → close variant → retry once → ask the user; auth errors → `origin` skill recovery table). Not a 4 because no checkpoint is missing or merely implicit.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and none are needed: this is a single-task skill under 50 lines with well-organized numbered sections and a Hard Limits section. The one external pointer (the `origin` skill at ~/.cursor/skills-cursor/origin/SKILL.md) is clearly signaled and exactly one level deep, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score.

Specificity

"Create a Cursor-hosted repo for the current project and push it" plus "installs and signs in the origin CLI when needed" lists several concrete actions (create, push, install, sign-in). Not a 5 because coverage is thin on what the flow involves overall (e.g., preparing/committing the project, remote wiring); not a 3 because more than 1-2 specific actions are named.

Completeness

Clearly answers both: what ("Create a Cursor-hosted repo for the current project and push it") and when ("Use when a project has no git remote yet and the user asks to create a repo on Cursor, push the project to Cursor, or set up a Cursor-hosted remote"). The 'Use when' clause is explicit with concrete trigger phrases and a precondition, matching the top anchor exactly.

Trigger Term Quality

"create a repo on Cursor", "push the project to Cursor", and "set up a Cursor-hosted remote" are natural phrases a user would actually say. Not a 5 because common synonyms like "publish", "upload", or "put this on Cursor" are absent, leaving a few natural trigger terms missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Cursor-specific triggers and the "no git remote yet" condition carve out a clear niche, but the skill body reveals a sibling `share` skill covering the identical flow, and the description offers no cue for choosing between them. Mostly distinct with minor overlap risk against that closely related skill, so not a 5.