CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

node24-action-upgrades

Upgrade checked-in GitHub Actions references off deprecated Node 20 runtimes with the smallest safe major bumps.

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.squad/skills/node24-action-upgrades/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is lean, well-structured, and gives concrete actionable checks with a clear sequenced workflow; its main gap is the absence of an explicit post-bump verification/feedback loop for this batch change.

Suggestions

Add a final verification step, e.g. 'After bumping, re-run the workflows and confirm no Node.js 20 deprecation warnings remain; if any persist, re-check that action's upstream tags per pattern 5.'

Provide the concrete command for pattern 1 (how to surface the real run warnings) so the entry point is fully executable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and efficient: a one-line context, five terse numbered patterns, a compact mapping table, and three anti-patterns, with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable checks ('inspect the candidate major tag's action.yml and confirm runs.using: node24', 'inspect nested uses: lines') plus a copy-ready before/after mapping, but it stops short of giving the exact command to surface the real run warnings referenced in pattern 1.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequenced workflow with an embedded validation checkpoint (confirm runs.using: node24 before changing), but this batch operation lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop (e.g. re-run and confirm the deprecation warning cleared), which caps batch-operation workflow clarity at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no external references needed and cleanly organized into Context, Patterns, Example mapping, and Anti-Patterns sections, meeting the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and well-scoped to a clear niche, but it omits any explicit 'Use when...' trigger guidance, which caps completeness and leaves trigger coverage at a mid level.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'when' clause, e.g. 'Use when GitHub Actions logs report Node.js 20 actions are deprecated and the repo needs a focused runtime cleanup.'

Mirror the exact log phrasing users will paste, such as 'Node.js 20 actions are deprecated', to improve natural trigger-term matching.

Optionally name a second concrete action (e.g. 'report unresolved upstream Node20 actions') to lift specificity toward level 4.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('checked-in GitHub Actions references') and one concrete action ('Upgrade ... off deprecated Node 20 runtimes with the smallest safe major bumps'), but it is a single action rather than the multiple concrete actions expected at level 4-5.

3 / 5

Completeness

It has a clear 'what' (upgrade checked-in refs off deprecated Node 20 runtimes) but no explicit 'when' / 'Use when...' trigger clause, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric guideline.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant keywords ('GitHub Actions', 'deprecated Node 20 runtimes', 'major bumps') that match log language, but misses common natural variations users would say such as 'Node.js 20 actions are deprecated' or 'upgrade Actions versions'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The deprecation-specific niche ('deprecated Node 20 runtimes', 'smallest safe major bumps') is mostly distinct with minimal overlap risk, though 'upgrade GitHub Actions' could still brush against general dependency-upgrade skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
sbroenne/mcp-server-excel
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.