Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with copy-paste-ready code and a clear progression from scaffolding to deployment, and is mostly concise. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: the referenced reference files are absent from the bundle and some content that could live in separate files is inlined.
Suggestions
Create the referenced bundle files (references/router-api.md, references/forms.md) so the 'When to Load References' navigation points to real, loadable content.
Move the larger inlined code patterns (e.g., full server-function and search-params examples) into the reference files, keeping only concise representative snippets in SKILL.md.
Add an explicit validation/retry feedback loop to the server-function mutation example (validate input, retry on failure) to lift workflow clarity for the destructive POST path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean — section headers with executable code blocks and minimal prose — with only minor over-explanation (the 'Secure Installation' preamble and 'Load the dependency-upgrade skill' aside), fitting 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than the fully lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, complete code examples for the common cases (scaffolding commands, package.json, app.config.ts, route components, server functions, API routes, Dockerfile) — matching 'fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequenced sections (Quick Start → Project Setup → routing → server functions → deployment) give a clear progression with mostly concrete checkpoints; the destructive/server-function mutation example lacks an explicit validate-then-retry feedback loop, capping it below 5 at 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is reasonable and a 'When to Load References' section signals references, but the referenced files (references/router-api.md, references/forms.md) do not exist in the bundle, and substantial API-style content is inlined — matching 'some structure but could be better organized; references present but not clearly signaled / content that should be separate is inline'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |