Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with an excellent verification-gate workflow and clean one-level-deep reference architecture. The main cost is redundancy: trigger lists and summaries repeat across four sections and could be consolidated to save context tokens.
Suggestions
State each protocol's triggers once — in 'When to Use This Skill' — and let the per-protocol sections and 'Integration with Workflows' reference them instead of restating them, cutting roughly a third of the body.
Drop or compress the 'Bottom Line' section, which re-summarizes the three practices already stated in the Overview.
Promote the subagent dispatch step to a copy-paste-ready prompt template showing the field layout (WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED, PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS, BASE_SHA, HEAD_SHA, DESCRIPTION) in an actual Task-tool invocation example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence (no concept-teaching padding), but trigger lists are repeated three times — in 'When to Use This Skill', again in each protocol section, and once more in 'Integration with Workflows' — plus a 'Bottom Line' recap of points already made. This is more than the 'minor instances' of a 4 but far from the padded verbosity of a 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable commands appear throughout ('BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1)', 'bun test', 'bun run typecheck', 'bunx tsc --noEmit') plus an explicit gate function and severity triage. Not a 5 because the subagent dispatch step describes required fields (WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED, BASE_SHA, ...) rather than giving a copy-paste-ready prompt template. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The verification gate is an explicit sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints ('IDENTIFY command → RUN full command → READ output → VERIFY confirms claim → THEN claim', 'Skip any step = lying'), an error-recovery red-flag STOP list, a triage feedback loop ('Fix Critical immediately, Important before proceeding'), and a decision tree for common situations — matching the explicit-validation-with-feedback-loops anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a clear overview with three references, each signaled inline ('Reference: references/...md' and 'Full protocol: references/...md'), all of which exist as real files one level deep with no nesting. Content is appropriately split between the overview and the per-protocol reference files, matching the well-signaled one-level-deep anchor; the body's trigger-list duplication is a conciseness issue, not a disclosure-structure one. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |