Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplar content body: lean, actionable, and well-structured with explicit verification gates and one-level-deep references to real bundle files. No significant weaknesses across any dimension.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: terse bullets, a compact decision tree, and copy-paste commands, with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance including git SHA commands, dispatch instructions, and runnable verification commands (bun test, bun run build, etc.) covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes are explicitly sequenced (READ→UNDERSTAND→VERIFY→EVALUATE→RESPOND→IMPLEMENT; IDENTIFY→RUN→READ→VERIFY→THEN claim) with explicit validation checkpoints and error-recovery feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with three well-signaled, one-level-deep references to real files (code-review-reception.md, requesting-code-review.md, verification-before-completion.md); content is appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |