seo-keyword-cluster-builder
SEO keyword clustering with topic organization, content hub architecture, internal linking strategies. Use for content strategy, keyword research, pillar page structures, or encountering cluster organization, hub architecture, internal linking errors.
76
63%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
96%
1.23xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/seo-keyword-cluster-builder/skills/seo-keyword-cluster-builder/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its SEO content architecture niche with specific capabilities and explicit trigger conditions. It uses appropriate third-person voice and includes natural keywords that content marketers would use. The description effectively distinguishes itself from general SEO or content writing skills through its focus on structural elements like clustering and hub architecture.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'SEO keyword clustering', 'topic organization', 'content hub architecture', 'internal linking strategies'. These are distinct, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (keyword clustering, topic organization, hub architecture, linking strategies) AND when ('Use for content strategy, keyword research, pillar page structures, or encountering cluster organization, hub architecture, internal linking errors'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'content strategy', 'keyword research', 'pillar page', 'cluster organization', 'hub architecture', 'internal linking'. Good coverage of SEO/content marketing terminology. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche in SEO content architecture with distinct triggers like 'pillar page', 'keyword clustering', 'hub architecture'. Unlikely to conflict with general writing or basic SEO skills due to specific structural focus. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
27%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill suffers from severe verbosity, explaining fundamental SEO concepts that Claude already understands while burying useful templates in excessive prose. The content would benefit from aggressive trimming to focus on the actionable templates and cluster-building process, with detailed reference material moved to separate files. The core value (templates and output formats) is present but obscured by unnecessary explanation.
Suggestions
Remove explanations of basic SEO concepts (topic clusters, search intent, anchor text basics) that Claude already knows - focus only on project-specific conventions
Extract the detailed templates, common patterns, and linking guidelines into separate reference files (TEMPLATES.md, PATTERNS.md) and link to them from a concise overview
Add a validation step after cluster creation (e.g., 'Verify each cluster has 3-5 semantically related keywords before proceeding to architecture')
Reduce the main skill to under 100 lines focusing on: quick start example, output format choice, and links to detailed references
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose at ~400+ lines with extensive explanations of basic SEO concepts Claude already knows (what topic clusters are, what search intent means, anchor text best practices). The content could be reduced by 70%+ while preserving all actionable value. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete templates and examples that are copy-paste ready, but much of the content is descriptive rather than executable. The templates are useful but buried in excessive explanatory text, and there's no actual code or tool commands. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are listed (Step 1, 2, 3) and a content calendar template exists, but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops. For a content strategy skill, there's no verification step to confirm clusters are properly organized before proceeding. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Monolithic wall of text with no references to external files. All content is inline including detailed templates, examples, patterns, and guidelines that should be split into separate reference documents (e.g., TEMPLATES.md, PATTERNS.md, LINKING-GUIDE.md). | 1 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- secondsky/claude-skills
- Commit
90d6bd7
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.