seo-optimizer
SEO optimization with keyword analysis, readability assessment, technical validation, content quality. Use for search rankings, blog posts, content audits, or encountering keyword density, readability scores, meta tags, schema markup errors.
89
85%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
97%
1.21xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that clearly defines SEO-specific capabilities and provides explicit trigger conditions. It uses third person voice appropriately, lists concrete actions, and includes both common user terms ('blog posts', 'search rankings') and technical SEO terminology ('schema markup', 'meta tags'). The description effectively distinguishes itself from general content or writing skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'keyword analysis, readability assessment, technical validation, content quality' - these are distinct, actionable capabilities rather than vague language. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('SEO optimization with keyword analysis, readability assessment, technical validation, content quality') and when ('Use for search rankings, blog posts, content audits, or encountering keyword density, readability scores, meta tags, schema markup errors'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'search rankings', 'blog posts', 'content audits', 'keyword density', 'readability scores', 'meta tags', 'schema markup' - good coverage of both general and technical SEO terms. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear SEO niche with distinct triggers like 'keyword density', 'meta tags', 'schema markup', 'readability scores' - these are specific to SEO and unlikely to conflict with general writing or content skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides comprehensive SEO guidance with good structure and clear workflows, but suffers from verbosity and could be more actionable. The priority system and report templates are strengths, while the explanatory content and lack of executable analysis code are weaknesses. Trimming obvious context and adding concrete implementation examples would significantly improve it.
Suggestions
Remove or drastically shorten the 'When to Use' and 'Core Philosophy' sections - these explain obvious contexts Claude already understands
Replace the illustrative JavaScript object with actual executable code showing how to calculate readability metrics or analyze keyword density
Convert descriptive guidance like 'Check placement in title, H1, first 100 words' into concrete regex patterns or code snippets that perform the check
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill contains useful information but is verbose in places. The overview and 'when to use' sections explain obvious contexts, and some sections like 'Core Philosophy' add little value. The content could be tightened significantly while preserving all actionable guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides good checklists and target metrics (keyword density 1-2%, Flesch score 60-70), but lacks truly executable code. The JavaScript example is illustrative rather than functional, and many recommendations are descriptive ('Check keyword usage') rather than showing exactly how to perform the analysis. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Example Analysis Flow' provides a clear 9-step sequence, priority levels are well-defined with visual indicators, and the report structure template gives explicit output format. The workflow is logical and easy to follow for this type of analytical task. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with clear sections, appropriate use of tables and code blocks, and explicit references to external files (references/analysis-framework.md, references/output-templates.md) for detailed content. Navigation is clear and references are one level deep. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- secondsky/claude-skills
- Commit
90d6bd7
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.