CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

woocommerce-code-review

Review WooCommerce code changes for coding standards compliance. Use when reviewing code locally, performing automated PR reviews, or checking code quality in WooCommerce projects.

61

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/woocommerce-code-review/skills/woocommerce-code-review/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-organized and token-efficient but over-relies on sibling skills that are not present, leaving detailed standards unresolvable and the review workflow without an explicit verification checkpoint.

Suggestions

Inline the most decision-critical standards (e.g., snake_case vs camelCase rule, the $sut test convention, validation-before-mutation rule) directly in SKILL.md so the skill is actionable even when the sibling skills are absent.

Add an explicit verification step to the Review Approach, e.g. "Confirm each flagged violation against the cited standard before reporting it" with a re-check loop.

Resolve or make the sibling-skill references explicit about their location and availability, and avoid presenting missing files as authoritative links.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes competence: violation categories are listed tersely with brief wrong/correct examples and no padded concept explanations, with only minor redundancy in the Notes section keeping it just below a 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete per-violation guidance and a copy wrong/correct example make it partially executable, but the detailed standards (e.g., what constitutes a camelCase or validation violation) are deferred to sibling skills whose files are not present, leaving key execution details missing.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

"Review Approach" gives a clear 5-step sequence and a defined output format, but there is no explicit validation/checkpoint step (e.g., confirm each flagged violation against the linked standard before reporting), matching the score-3 anchor with implicit checkpoints.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Section structure is clear and references are signaled per category, but every detailed standard links to sibling-skill files (../woocommerce-backend-dev/*.md, ../woocommerce-copy-guidelines/*.md) that do not exist in the filesystem, and this skill has no bundle files, so the references are unresolvable rather than well-placed.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it concisely states what the skill does and gives explicit, concrete trigger conditions keyed to WooCommerce. Both the completeness and distinctiveness anchors are fully met, with only minor keyword-coverage gaps.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Review WooCommerce code changes for coding standards compliance" plus "reviewing code locally, performing automated PR reviews, or checking code quality" lists several specific actions with only minor coverage gaps, fitting the score-4 anchor better than the 1-2-action score-3 anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly states the "what" (review WooCommerce code changes for coding standards compliance) and the "when" ("Use when reviewing code locally, performing automated PR reviews, or checking code quality in WooCommerce projects") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases a user would say ("reviewing code locally", "automated PR reviews", "code quality", "WooCommerce projects") give good keyword coverage, though a few synonyms are missing, so it sits at 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoping to "WooCommerce code changes" and "coding standards compliance" carves a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk against generic code-review skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 13 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
secondsky/claude-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.