Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, actionable, and well-structured for a simple single-purpose skill, with real executable code examples and clear sectioning, limited only by minor unspecified variables and absent error-recovery guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence: a usage line plus two short subcommand sections each with a compact code block and a one-line output statement, with only minor over-explanation in the inline comments. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides mostly executable guidance with real imports and concrete method calls (ExplanationGenerator, ctx.trace_decision_explainability, ctx.get_causal_chain), with minor gaps where some variables (reasoning_result, depth) are referenced but not shown bound. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Two clearly-separated entry points each with explicit inputs and stated outputs; the task is non-destructive so the validation cap does not apply, but no error-recovery guidance for missing IDs keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no need for external bundle files, the well-organized section headers (decision, graph) satisfy the simple-skill exception allowing a 5 from clear organization alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |