Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured for a simple skill, but its code examples are not fully executable and it lacks validation/verification steps for what are batch ingestion operations.
Suggestions
Make code examples copy-paste ready by showing how path, file_format, conn, and query are obtained, or note them as placeholders explicitly.
Add a verification step after ingestion (e.g., check the returned node/edge counts or warnings before proceeding) since ingest is a batch operation.
Document the API and stream sources promised in the description, or remove them from the description if unsupported.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: it skips concept explanations Claude already knows and presents only usage, signatures, and outputs, so every token earns its place; not penalized because there is no verbosity to trim. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Real imports and function signatures are given, but calls reference undefined variables (path, file_format, conn, query) and are not copy-paste ready, and the API/stream sources from the description are undocumented; not at 3 because the guidance is incomplete rather than fully executable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Usage and subcommands are clearly laid out, but ingestion is a batch operation with no validation, verification, or error-recovery steps, so workflow clarity is capped at 2 per the rubric notes. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, the well-organized file/db sections satisfy the simple-skill anchor for progressive disclosure at 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |