Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-organized into two clear single-step tasks with appropriate code snippets. Its main weakness is actionability: the code examples are fragmentary rather than fully executable, with unbound variables preventing copy-paste use.
Suggestions
Make code examples executable end-to-end by binding inputs (e.g., show how concept_name, graph, and schema_file are obtained) so snippets are copy-paste ready.
Show the return-value shape of get_concept and validate_graph with a short example output so Claude knows what to expect and how to act on it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with short headers, minimal prose, and code snippets, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete code (OntologyManager, get_concept, validate_graph) but the snippets are fragmentary with unbound variables (concept_name, graph, schema_file) and are not copy-paste executable end-to-end, fitting 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details'. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Each task (describe, validate) is a single unambiguous action clearly sequenced; per the simple-skills note, single-action skills can score 3, and validate even surfaces errors and correction suggestions. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references; its two well-organized sections satisfy the guideline allowing under-50-line skills to score 3 on organization alone. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |