comment-writer
Write warm, direct collaboration comments. Trigger: PR feedback, issue replies, reviews, Slack messages, or GitHub comments.
74
91%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
82%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a reasonably well-crafted description with strong trigger terms and clear completeness, explicitly stating both what the skill does and when to use it. Its main weaknesses are the lack of specific concrete actions beyond 'write comments' and some potential overlap with other code review or writing skills. Adding more specific capabilities and narrowing the scope would strengthen it.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions, e.g., 'Write warm, direct collaboration comments including code review feedback, approval messages, constructive change requests, and team acknowledgments.'
Differentiate from general writing or code review skills by specifying the unique value, e.g., mentioning the tone framework or communication style principles that distinguish this skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (collaboration comments) and describes the style ('warm, direct'), but doesn't list multiple concrete actions beyond 'write comments'. It lacks specifics like 'approve PRs', 'request changes', 'suggest improvements', etc. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (write warm, direct collaboration comments) and 'when' (explicitly lists triggers: PR feedback, issue replies, reviews, Slack messages, GitHub comments). The 'Trigger:' clause serves as an explicit 'Use when' equivalent. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural trigger terms users would actually say: 'PR feedback', 'issue replies', 'reviews', 'Slack messages', 'GitHub comments'. These cover multiple common variations of collaboration communication contexts. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | While the trigger terms are fairly specific to collaboration/communication contexts, 'comments' and 'reviews' are broad enough to potentially overlap with code review skills or general writing skills. The 'warm, direct' tone qualifier helps distinguish it somewhat but the scope is still broad. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent, lean skill that teaches collaboration comment writing through concrete examples and a tight rule set. The comment formula provides a clear template, the examples are realistic and varied, and the voice rules table is efficiently structured. The skill respects Claude's intelligence by showing rather than explaining.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section earns its place. The voice rules table is tight, the comment formula is minimal, and examples demonstrate rather than explain. No unnecessary preamble or concept explanations. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete comment formula template, three complete real-world examples showing different scenarios, and an executable gh CLI command. The voice rules table gives specific, actionable constraints rather than vague guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a single-task skill (writing collaboration comments) with a clear formula (observation → why → next action) and unambiguous rules. No multi-step destructive operations are involved, so the simple, clear structure is sufficient. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized with clear sections (When to Use, Voice Rules, Comment Formula, Examples, Commands). No monolithic walls of text or unnecessary nesting. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- sergiodvillegas-art/gentle-ai
- Commit
3bfa934
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.