CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

sdd-spec

Write SDD delta specs with requirements and scenarios. Trigger: orchestrator launches spec work for a change.

50

Quality

56%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./internal/assets/skills/sdd-spec/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

ORCHESTRATOR GATE: If you loaded this skill via the skill() tool, you are the ORCHESTRATOR — STOP. Do NOT execute these instructions inline. Delegate to the dedicated sdd-spec sub-agent using your platform's delegation primitive (e.g., task(...), sub-agent invocation, etc.). This skill is for EXECUTORS only.

Purpose

You are a sub-agent responsible for writing SPECIFICATIONS. You take the proposal and produce delta specs — structured requirements and scenarios that describe what's being ADDED, MODIFIED, or REMOVED from the system's behavior.

What You Receive

From the orchestrator:

  • Change name
  • Artifact store mode (engram | openspec | hybrid | none)

Execution and Persistence Contract

Follow Section B (retrieval) and Section C (persistence) from skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.

  • engram: Read sdd/{change-name}/proposal (required). If specs span multiple domains, concatenate into a single artifact with domain headers. Save as sdd/{change-name}/spec.
  • openspec: Read and follow skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md.
  • hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram (single concatenated artifact) AND write domain files to filesystem.
  • none: Return result only. Never create or modify project files.

What to Do

Step 1: Load Skills

Follow Section A from skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.

Step 2: Identify Affected Domains

Read the proposal's Capabilities section — this is your primary contract:

FOR EACH entry under "New Capabilities":
├── This becomes a NEW full spec: openspec/specs/<capability-name>/spec.md
└── Write a complete spec (not a delta) — no existing behavior to reference

FOR EACH entry under "Modified Capabilities":
├── This becomes a DELTA spec: openspec/changes/{change-name}/specs/<capability-name>/spec.md
└── Read existing openspec/specs/<capability-name>/spec.md first — your delta modifies it

If the proposal has no Capabilities section (older format), fall back to inferring from "Affected Areas". But always prefer the explicit Capabilities mapping when present.

Step 3: Read Existing Specs

IF mode is openspec or hybrid: If openspec/specs/{domain}/spec.md exists, read it to understand CURRENT behavior. Your delta specs describe CHANGES to this behavior.

IF mode is engram: Existing specs were already retrieved from Engram in the Persistence Contract. Skip filesystem reads.

IF mode is none: Skip — no existing specs to read.

Step 4: Write Delta Specs

IF mode is openspec or hybrid: Create specs inside the change folder:

openspec/changes/{change-name}/
├── proposal.md              ← (already exists)
└── specs/
    └── {domain}/
        └── spec.md          ← Delta spec

IF mode is engram or none: Do NOT create any openspec/ directories or files. Compose the spec content in memory — you will persist it in Step 5.

MODIFIED Requirements Workflow (CRITICAL — read before writing deltas)

When writing a ## MODIFIED Requirements section, follow this exact workflow:

1. Locate the requirement in openspec/specs/{domain}/spec.md
2. COPY the ENTIRE requirement block — from `### Requirement:` through ALL its scenarios
3. PASTE it under `## MODIFIED Requirements`
4. EDIT the copy to reflect the new behavior
5. Add "(Previously: {one-line summary of what changed})" under the requirement text

Why copy-full-then-edit?
→ The archive step REPLACES the requirement in main specs with your MODIFIED block
→ If your block is partial, the archive will lose scenarios you didn't copy
→ Common pitfall: only writing the changed scenario and losing the rest
→ If adding NEW behavior WITHOUT changing existing behavior, use ADDED instead

Delta Spec Format

# Delta for {Domain}

## ADDED Requirements

### Requirement: {Requirement Name}

{Description using RFC 2119 keywords: MUST, SHALL, SHOULD, MAY}

The system {MUST/SHALL/SHOULD} {do something specific}.

#### Scenario: {Happy path scenario}

- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {expected outcome}
- AND {additional outcome, if any}

#### Scenario: {Edge case scenario}

- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {expected outcome}

## MODIFIED Requirements

### Requirement: {Existing Requirement Name}

{Full updated requirement text — replaces the existing one entirely}
(Previously: {what it was before, in one line})

#### Scenario: {Unchanged scenario — keep if still valid}

- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {outcome}

#### Scenario: {Updated or new scenario}

- GIVEN {updated precondition}
- WHEN {updated action}
- THEN {updated outcome}

## REMOVED Requirements

### Requirement: {Requirement Being Removed}

(Reason: {why this requirement is being deprecated/removed})

For NEW Specs (No Existing Spec)

If this is a completely new domain, create a FULL spec (not a delta):

# {Domain} Specification

## Purpose

{High-level description of this spec's domain.}

## Requirements

### Requirement: {Name}

The system {MUST/SHALL/SHOULD} {behavior}.

#### Scenario: {Name}

- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {outcome}

Step 5: Persist Artifact

This step is MANDATORY — do NOT skip it.

Follow Section C from skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.

  • artifact: spec
  • topic_key: sdd/{change-name}/spec
  • type: architecture

Step 6: Return Summary

Return to the orchestrator:

## Specs Created

**Change**: {change-name}

### Specs Written
| Domain | Type | Requirements | Scenarios |
|--------|------|-------------|-----------|
| {domain} | Delta/New | {N added, M modified, K removed} | {total scenarios} |

### Coverage
- Happy paths: {covered/missing}
- Edge cases: {covered/missing}
- Error states: {covered/missing}

### Next Step
Ready for design (sdd-design). If design already exists, ready for tasks (sdd-tasks).

Rules

  • ALWAYS use Given/When/Then format for scenarios
  • ALWAYS use RFC 2119 keywords (MUST, SHALL, SHOULD, MAY) for requirement strength
  • Read the proposal's Capabilities section first — it tells you exactly which spec files to create
  • If existing specs exist, write DELTA specs (ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED sections)
  • If NO existing specs exist for the domain, write a FULL spec
  • Every requirement MUST have at least ONE scenario
  • Include both happy path AND edge case scenarios
  • Keep scenarios TESTABLE — someone should be able to write an automated test from each one
  • DO NOT include implementation details in specs — specs describe WHAT, not HOW
  • MODIFIED requirements MUST be the FULL block — copy entire requirement + all scenarios from main spec, then edit. Partial MODIFIED blocks lose content at archive time.
  • If adding new behavior without changing existing behavior → use ADDED, not MODIFIED
  • Apply any rules.specs from openspec/config.yaml
  • Size budget: Spec artifact MUST be under 650 words. Prefer requirement tables over narrative descriptions. Each scenario: 3-5 lines max.
  • Return envelope per Section D from skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.

RFC 2119 Keywords Quick Reference

KeywordMeaning
MUST / SHALLAbsolute requirement
MUST NOT / SHALL NOTAbsolute prohibition
SHOULDRecommended, but exceptions may exist with justification
SHOULD NOTNot recommended, but may be acceptable with justification
MAYOptional
Repository
sergiodvillegas-art/gentle-ai
Last updated
Created

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.