Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, highly actionable reference: concrete class definitions, colors, and copy-paste-ready HTML patterns for the common slide types. Its only weaknesses are minor — a duplicated weight-badge note, no explicit ordering/usage workflow, and a flat structure that could benefit from a brief orientation line.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the weight-badge guidance by stating the JS auto-injection rule once and cross-referencing it from the Journey Bar section.
Add a one-line orientation at the top (what slide types these patterns cover and when to combine them) to give the flat catalog a navigation layer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean reference: one-line class descriptions (".two-col — 2-column grid layout with 24px gap") and executable HTML snippets with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. The only trimmable redundancy is the weight-badge JS-injection note repeated in two places (the slide-pattern section and the Journey Bar section), which fits 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than the fully lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The content gives copy-paste-ready HTML for the common cases — a two-column good/bad slide, a trigger-box + code-block slide, and an icon list — plus concrete class semantics, hex colors for syntax spans, and an explicit 'do not hardcode' instruction. This matches 'fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a single-purpose lookup/reference skill with unambiguous application guidance and one explicit behavioral rule (weight badges are JS-injected), and it involves no destructive or batch operations, so no validation cap applies. It sits just above the rubric's under-50-line simple-skill exception (~105 lines) with no explicit sequencing or self-check guidance, so 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present' fits better than a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections (Layout, Content Blocks, Lists, Tags & Badges, Syntax Highlighting, Slide Type Patterns, Journey Bar) are well organized with all content appropriately inline for a single-file reference; no bundle files exist, so nothing is buried or nested. It misses the 5 anchor because the file exceeds the simple-skill threshold and reads as a flat catalog with no overview/navigation layer. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |