CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

vibe-to-agentic-framework

The conceptual framework behind the presentation — what "Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering" means, why the journey is structured the way it is, and how every slide fits the narrative arc

39

Quality

37%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/presentation/vibe-to-agentic-framework/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

50%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured conceptual framework with presentation-specific detail, but it is verbose, largely descriptive rather than instructive, and monolithic with no progressive disclosure into separate files.

Suggestions

Tighten the repeated 'Why X level' rationale and before/after framing into concise bullets to reduce verbosity.

Make the 'How to Use This Framework' section more concrete by giving explicit checks (e.g., verify the slide's data-level matches its part, confirm no concept is referenced before its section).

Split the per-part breakdown and the Level Transition Reference Table into a separate reference file and link to it from the overview to apply progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body provides presentation-specific detail (slide ranges, levels, data-level values) that Claude would not know, but includes verbose pedagogical rationale ('Why Low level:', 'Why Medium level:') and repeated before/after framing that could be tightened, matching 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete reference details (the Level Transition Reference Table, data-level values, slide ranges) give some actionable guidance, but the 'How to Use' section is high-level ('consider', 'show the contrast') and the bulk is descriptive rather than instructive.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The parts (Part 0–6 plus Appendix) are clearly sequenced with slide ranges and the editing guidance is a numbered list, but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops, so it stops at 'sequence present but checkpoints missing'.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized with clear headers, but the ~170-line document is monolithic with all content inline and no external references; the per-part breakdown and reference table could be split into separate files.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Description

25%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is abstract and conceptual, explaining the framework's intent without naming concrete actions or providing explicit trigger guidance. It lacks a 'Use when...' clause and natural keywords, limiting its discoverability and actionability.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause stating when Claude should invoke this skill (e.g., when creating or editing slides for the 'Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering' presentation).

Replace abstract phrasing with concrete actions the skill performs (e.g., 'Structures slides into the 4-level journey, assigns data-level attributes, and verifies narrative arc placement').

Include natural trigger keywords users would actually say, such as 'presentation slides', 'journey levels', or 'slide editing'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description uses only abstract language ('conceptual framework', 'what it means', 'how every slide fits the narrative arc') and names no concrete actions, matching the score-1 'vague or no actions' anchor rather than the score-2 'names domain and some actions'.

1 / 3

Completeness

It states a weak 'what' (explains the framework, why it is structured, how slides fit) but has no 'when should Claude use it' / 'Use when' clause, which per the guidelines caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

There are no natural trigger terms a user would say when needing this skill; phrases like 'narrative arc' and 'journey is structured' are conceptual jargon, matching the 'no natural keywords' score-1 anchor.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It is tied to a named presentation ('Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering'), giving it a somewhat specific niche, but the absence of distinct triggers and the conceptual framing leave it overlapping with generic presentation skills.

2 / 3

Total

6

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.