backend-implementation

Backend Implementation Workflow Agent. Backend만 구현이 필요한 경우 사용합니다. API 추가, 서비스 로직 구현, DB 스키마 변경 등을 오케스트레이션합니다.

Quality

51%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/backend-implementation/SKILL.md

Quality

Discovery

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description adequately explains when to use the skill (backend-only implementation) and lists relevant actions, meeting completeness requirements. However, it could be more specific about concrete outputs and include more natural trigger terms. The distinctiveness is moderate as backend-related terms may overlap with other development skills.

Suggestions

Add more natural trigger term variations including English equivalents: 'REST API', 'endpoint', 'database migration', 'server-side logic', 'repository layer'

Specify concrete outputs or deliverables beyond 'orchestration', such as 'generates controller code, service classes, and migration files'

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (Backend) and lists some actions ('API 추가, 서비스 로직 구현, DB 스키마 변경'), but uses the vague term '오케스트레이션' (orchestration) without specifying concrete steps or outputs.	2 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both what ('API 추가, 서비스 로직 구현, DB 스키마 변경 등을 오케스트레이션') and when ('Backend만 구현이 필요한 경우 사용합니다') with an explicit trigger condition.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes relevant keywords like 'Backend', 'API', '서비스 로직', 'DB 스키마' that users might mention, but misses common variations like 'REST API', 'database', 'endpoint', 'server-side', or English equivalents for bilingual users.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'Backend' focus provides some distinction, but terms like 'API', '서비스 로직', 'DB 스키마' could overlap with general coding skills, database skills, or full-stack implementation skills.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Implementation

35%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill provides a clear visual overview of a backend implementation workflow with well-organized phases and agent responsibilities. However, it lacks actionable implementation details—there's no executable code, no concrete agent invocation syntax, and validation steps are mentioned as warnings rather than integrated checkpoints. The content describes what should happen rather than instructing how to do it.

Suggestions

Add concrete, executable examples showing how to actually invoke each agent (e.g., actual command syntax, API calls, or configuration files)

Integrate validation checkpoints directly into the workflow phases with explicit 'if error, then X' feedback loops rather than listing warnings separately

Provide links to individual agent skill files (e.g., [backend-architect](./agents/backend-architect.md)) for progressive disclosure

Include at least one complete end-to-end example showing inputs, agent outputs, and expected artifacts for a simple feature implementation

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The content is reasonably efficient with tables and diagrams, but includes some redundancy between the workflow diagram and the Phase tables that repeat similar information. The Korean descriptions are brief but could be tighter.	2 / 3
Actionability	The skill describes a workflow orchestration process but provides no executable code, no concrete commands beyond placeholder bash examples, and no actual implementation details for how to invoke or configure these agents.	1 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The phases are clearly sequenced with parallel/sequential indicators, but validation checkpoints are mentioned only as warnings in '주의사항' without explicit feedback loops or error recovery steps integrated into the workflow.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The content is well-structured with clear sections and tables, but references to other agents (tech-implementation, frontend-implementation, etc.) lack links or paths. The output directory structure is helpful but no references to detailed documentation exist.	2 / 3
	Total	7 / 12 Passed

Validation

90%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
allowed_tools_field	'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)	Warning

	Total	10 / 11 Passed

Repository: shaul1991/shaul-agents-plugin
Commit: 9242c58

Reviewed: 29 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.