Content
35%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a clear visual overview of a backend implementation workflow with well-organized phases and agent responsibilities. However, it lacks actionable implementation details—there's no executable code, no concrete agent invocation syntax, and validation steps are mentioned as warnings rather than integrated checkpoints. The content describes what should happen rather than instructing how to do it.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable examples showing how to actually invoke each agent (e.g., actual command syntax, API calls, or configuration files)
Integrate validation checkpoints directly into the workflow phases with explicit 'if error, then X' feedback loops rather than listing warnings separately
Provide links to individual agent skill files (e.g., [backend-architect](./agents/backend-architect.md)) for progressive disclosure
Include at least one complete end-to-end example showing inputs, agent outputs, and expected artifacts for a simple feature implementation
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably efficient with tables and diagrams, but includes some redundancy between the workflow diagram and the Phase tables that repeat similar information. The Korean descriptions are brief but could be tighter. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill describes a workflow orchestration process but provides no executable code, no concrete commands beyond placeholder bash examples, and no actual implementation details for how to invoke or configure these agents. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The phases are clearly sequenced with parallel/sequential indicators, but validation checkpoints are mentioned only as warnings in '주의사항' without explicit feedback loops or error recovery steps integrated into the workflow. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear sections and tables, but references to other agents (tech-implementation, frontend-implementation, etc.) lack links or paths. The output directory structure is helpful but no references to detailed documentation exist. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |