Content
22%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill reads as a job description rather than actionable instructions. It lists responsibilities and trigger keywords but provides zero concrete guidance on how to perform growth hacking tasks, design experiments, or calculate ICE scores. Claude would not know what to actually do when triggered.
Suggestions
Add a concrete workflow for designing growth experiments (e.g., 1. Identify metric → 2. Form hypothesis → 3. Calculate ICE score → 4. Design MVP test → 5. Define success criteria)
Include an executable example of ICE scoring with actual formula and sample calculation
Provide a template or example output for experiment documentation that should go in docs/growth/experiments/
Add specific growth hacking techniques with concrete implementation steps rather than just listing '그로스 해킹 기법 적용'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is brief and doesn't over-explain concepts, but it's essentially a role description rather than actionable skill content. The bullet points are lean but lack substance. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides no concrete guidance, code, commands, or examples. It only lists abstract responsibilities like '성장 전략 수립' without explaining how to actually perform these tasks or what outputs look like. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No workflow or process is defined. There's no sequence of steps, no validation checkpoints, and no guidance on how to actually execute growth hacking experiments or apply ICE scoring. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill mentions output locations (docs/growth/strategy/, docs/growth/experiments/) which suggests some structure, but there are no references to detailed guides, templates, or examples that would help Claude execute the tasks. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |