Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is tight, concrete, and well-organized with an executable manifest skeleton and a precise API surface, so it scores at the top on conciseness, actionability, and structure. The only gap is workflow validation, which is mental rather than an explicit validate-and-retry loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean throughout: it never explains what Chrome MV3 or a service worker is, and the file list, manifest skeleton, API surface, workflow, and guardrails each carry actionable weight with no padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides a copy-paste-ready manifest.json skeleton and a specific list of supported chrome.* method names, giving fully executable guidance rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four numbered steps are clearly sequenced and include a checkpoint, but the verification ("Test mentally: walk through one user action and confirm every permission used is declared") is a mental check with no feedback loop for error recovery. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single self-contained ~60-line file with clearly labeled sections (Required files, manifest skeleton, Supported APIs, Workflow, Don't) and no nested references, which is appropriate for a focused single-purpose skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |