Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an actionable, well-sequenced orchestration recipe with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops covering its batch and destructive operations. It is somewhat verbose due to repeated exclusion patterns and remains a monolithic single-file skill with no progressive disclosure to bundled references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient procedural guidance with no basic-concept padding, but the Consumed Task Set exclusion patterns (the `*-task-prep-*.md`, `_overview-*.md`, etc. list) are stated verbatim in both Work Plan Resolution and the Consumed Task Set section, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Highly concrete for an instruction-only skill: specific subagent_type values ('dev-workflows:task-executor', 'dev-workflows:quality-fixer'), Agent tool invocation templates, exact response fields to branch on ('status', 'requiresTestReview', 'stub_detected'), and a defined Completion Report Contract — copy-paste-ready guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 4-step cycle (task-executor -> escalation check -> quality-fixer -> commit) with per-status branches, feedback loops (return to executor with requiredFixes/incompleteImplementations), a Pre-execution Checklist, and a Post-Implementation fix cycle that repeats until all pass or blocked — clear sequence with validation checkpoints and error-recovery loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections, tables, and checklists, but monolithic: all detail is inlined in a single SKILL.md with no bundle files (references/scripts/assets absent), and dense procedural logic such as the Work Plan Resolution rules is not split out — matching 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline' rather than a split, one-level-deep structure. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |