Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tightly written, well-sequenced orchestrator recipe with concrete agent invocations, explicit validation checkpoints, and strong feedback loops. It practices progressive disclosure by leaning on other named skills for detail rather than inlining it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is terse procedural routing with no concept-explaining padding (it assumes Claude knows git, commits, agents); the only trimmable excess is repeated cross-references to subagents-orchestration-guide, keeping it just above the mostly-efficient anchor at 3. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It names concrete subagent_types ("dev-workflows:task-decomposer", "dev-workflows:task-executor", "dev-workflows:code-verifier", "dev-workflows:security-reviewer") with specific parameters (task_file, diffBase, mutationEvidence, qualityCommand) and status routing, leaving only minor gaps in exact prompt text for some calls. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases are explicitly sequenced (Prerequisites → Materialization → Checklist → 4-step Execution Cycle → Post-Implementation Verification → Final Cleanup → Completion Report) with a Pre-execution Checklist and explicit feedback loops (needs_revision returns to step 1; quality-fixer runs before every commit), matching the clear-sequence-with-validation-and-feedback anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill acts as a well-sectioned overview that offloads detail to clearly signaled external skills ("Execute Skill: subagents-orchestration-guide", "read references/review-resolution.md") rather than duplicating it; the only gap is the absence of its own bundle files, leaving it just below the ideal one-level-deep-references anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |