Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, highly actionable orchestration spec with excellent workflow clarity — explicit sequence, validation gates, feedback loops, and a checklist — supported by exact subagent invocation templates. Its only real drag is mild redundancy across the three representations of the flow and the absence of any file-level content split for a >50-line skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and procedural without padding in basic concepts, but the flow is restated three times (Execution Protocol, ASCII Workflow Overview, detailed Execution Flow) and the CRITICAL note plus the subagents-orchestration-guide caveat paragraph repeat already-covered points, fitting 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It specifies exact subagent_type strings, description values, and concrete prompt templates with explicit bracketed placeholders, plus exact AskUserQuestion options and edge-case recovery — copy-paste-ready Agent tool invocations that are fully executable guidance for an orchestration skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–4 are clearly sequenced with explicit [STOP] validation checkpoints, named quality gates, a re-run feedback loop in Step 3, edge-case recovery in Step 1, and a Completion Criteria checklist, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps, feedback loops, and checklists' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and external references (subagents-orchestration-guide, llm-friendly-context, subagent_types) are clearly signaled one level deep, but no bundle files exist and all detail is inline in a single ~120-line file, fitting 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline'. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |