Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly-structured autonomous-execution orchestration recipe with concrete Agent invocations, an explicit 4-step cycle, validation gates, feedback loops, and a checklist. It is efficient and clearly navigable, with only minor redundancy and a few details deferred to external skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense procedural content that assumes Claude's competence with only minor redundancy (the Consumed Task Set pattern and Review Resolution are restated several times); not a 5 because some trimming is possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete Agent invocations with explicit subagent_type values, named parameters (task_file, diffBase, mutationEvidence), and explicit status-routing fields give mostly executable guidance; not a 5 because several details are deferred to external skills. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The explicit 4-step cycle (execute, branch, quality-fix, commit) with numbered steps, branch logic, validation gates, feedback loops (needs_revision/stub_detected return to step 1), and a pre-execution checklist matches 'Clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery; checklists'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned single file with clear headers and no nested references, but the detailed decision-flow table and status routing could arguably be split into reference files for this complex recipe; matches 'Good structure; most content appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |