Orchestrate full-cycle implementation across backend and frontend layers
35
31%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/recipe-fullstack-implement/SKILL.mdContext: Full-cycle fullstack implementation management (Requirements Analysis → Design (backend + frontend) → Planning → Implementation → Quality Assurance)
Core Identity: "I am an orchestrator." (see subagents-orchestration-guide skill)
MANDATORY: Read references/monorepo-flow.md from subagents-orchestration-guide skill BEFORE proceeding. Follow the Fullstack Flow defined there instead of the standard single-layer flow.
CRITICAL: Execute all steps, sub-agents, and stopping points defined in both the monorepo-flow.md reference and subagents-orchestration-guide skill.
Instruction Content: $ARGUMENTS
Assess the current situation:
| Situation Pattern | Decision Criteria | Next Action |
|---|---|---|
| New Requirements | No existing work, new feature/fix request | Start with requirement-analyzer |
| Flow Continuation | Existing docs/tasks present, continuation directive | Identify next step in monorepo-flow.md |
| Quality Errors | Error detection, test failures, build errors | Execute quality-fixer (layer-appropriate) |
| Ambiguous | Intent unclear, multiple interpretations possible | Confirm with user |
When continuing existing flow, verify:
Follow monorepo-flow.md for the complete design-through-planning flow (Steps 1-16 for Large scale, Steps 1-14 for Medium scale). The flow table in that reference defines every step, agent invocation, parallelization rule, and stop point.
Key points to enforce as the orchestrator runs the flow:
After scale determination, register all steps of the monorepo-flow.md using TaskCreate:
in_progress using TaskUpdateWhen user responds to questions:
scopeDependencies.question → Check impact for scale changeconfidence: "confirmed" or no scale change → Proceed to next stepPre-execution Checklist (MANDATORY):
Required Flow Compliance:
After work-planner completes and the user grants batch approval, before invoking task-decomposer, read the work plan header and find the line Implementation Readiness: <status>. Apply this rule:
| Status | Action |
|---|---|
ready | Proceed to task-decomposer |
escalated | Read the work plan's Readiness Report section, surface remaining gaps to the user via AskUserQuestion: "Implementation Readiness is escalated with the following remaining gaps: [list]. Continue execution? (y/n)". On y proceed; on n stop |
pending | Present via AskUserQuestion: "Implementation Readiness is pending. Run /recipe-prepare-implementation [plan-path] first to verify the work plan is implementable, then resume. Continue without preflight? (y/n)". On y proceed; on n stop |
| absent (line missing) | Treat as pending — older work plans created before the readiness marker existed should be preflighted explicitly |
Append the following block to every subagent prompt invoked from this recipe:
Scope boundary for subagents:
Operate within the task scope and referenced files in the prompt.
Use loaded skills to execute that scope.
Escalate when the required fix or investigation falls outside that scope.Agent routing by task filename (see monorepo-flow.md reference):
*-backend-task-* → dev-workflows:task-executor + dev-workflows:quality-fixer
*-frontend-task-* → dev-workflows-frontend:task-executor-frontend + dev-workflows-frontend:quality-fixer-frontendRules:
task_filestub_detected → Return to executor with incompleteImplementations[] detailsblocked → Escalate to userapproved → Proceed to commitAfter all task cycles finish, run verification agents in parallel before the completion report:
Invoke both in parallel using Agent tool:
doc_type: design-doc, single document_path, code_paths: implementation file list from git diff --name-only main...HEAD)Consolidate results — check pass/fail for each:
status is consistent or mostly_consistent. fail when needs_review or inconsistent. Collect discrepancies with status drift, conflict, or gapstatus is approved or approved_with_notes. fail when needs_revision. blocked → Escalate to userFix cycle (when any verifier failed):
blocked → Escalate to userAll passed → Proceed to Final Cleanup
Before the completion report, delete the implementation task files this recipe consumed. Their work is committed; docs/plans/ is ephemeral working state and is not retained between recipe runs:
docs/plans/tasks/{plan-name}-backend-task-*.md and docs/plans/tasks/{plan-name}-frontend-task-*.md (the {plan-name} derived from the work plan path used in this run)docs/plans/tasks/{plan-name}-phase*-completion.md (the per-phase completion files generated by task-decomposer)docs/plans/tasks/_overview-{plan-name}.md if presentdocs/plans/{plan-name}.md) — the user decides whether to delete it after final reviewIf task files cannot be deleted (filesystem error), report the failure but do not block the completion report.
After acceptance-test-generator execution, when invoking work-planner (subagent_type: "dev-workflows:work-planner"), communicate:
generatedFiles.integration)generatedFiles.fixtureE2e)generatedFiles.serviceE2e)e2eAbsenceReason.fixtureE2e and e2eAbsenceReason.serviceE2e, when each lane is null)All work is executed through sub-agents. Sub-agent selection follows monorepo-flow.md reference and subagents-orchestration-guide skill.
68ecb4a
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.