Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-organized, reasonably lean orchestration recipe with a clear gated workflow, but its actionability is limited by reliance on an undefined rule-advisor JSON schema that leaves later steps abstract. It uses progressive disclosure effectively by deferring detail to other skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding of basic concepts, though Step 4 re-lists outputs already covered in Steps 2-3, giving minor over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Step 1 provides a concrete, executable Agent-tool invocation with subagent_type/description/prompt, but later steps reference undefined JSON fields (taskAnalysis.essence, selectedRules, warningPatterns) whose structure is never shown, leaving key execution details incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step sequence is clear and Step 3 introduces an explicit gate/evidence checkpoint ('advance only when its required evidence exists'), though the checkpoints are abstract rather than concrete verification commands. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This under-50-line skill is well-organized into clear sections and delegates detail to other named skills as one-level references, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |