Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong orchestration recipe: fully executable prompt templates, unambiguous sequencing, and explicit validation/feedback loops at every gate. Its main weakness is redundancy — scope, approval, and resolution-gate statements are each repeated multiple times, which inflates token cost without adding information.
Suggestions
State the completion scope and the final-approval stop condition once (e.g., in the Execution Gate) and reference it from Step 6 and the Completion Criteria instead of repeating the full sentence three times.
Merge the two Review Resolution Gate declarations (Orchestrator Definition and Step 5) into a single definition with pointers from the usage sites.
Trim restatements like "**CRITICAL**: Execute document-reviewer" since the Execution Protocol and Step 5 already mandate it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence (no concept explanations) and is dense with tables and prompt templates, but the same content is repeated: "Complete when the user approves completing the update" appears three times (Execution Protocol, Responsibility Boundary, Completion Criteria), the Review Resolution Gate is restated twice, and the final-approval stop condition is declared in three places. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact subagent prompt blocks with field-by-field mechanical extraction instructions ("copy the named source values into the exact fields"), decision tables mapping path patterns to update agents, and per-document-type reviewer invocation shapes that cover the common Design Doc / PRD / ADR cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-6 are strictly ordered with an explicit Execution Gate, and validation is thorough: code-verifier runs before document-reviewer for Design Docs, review results branch into a revise-and-re-review loop with prior_feedback, design-sync conflicts return corrections to Step 4 with convergence rules, failures retry once, and a completion checklist plus a final approval stop gate close the flow. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and the single-file body is well-sectioned (Orchestrator Definition, Scope Boundaries, Execution Flow, Error Handling, Completion Criteria); the one external reference (references/review-resolution.md in subagents-orchestration-guide) is clearly signaled and one level deep, but the per-type prompt templates and review shapes could arguably be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |