Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, lean overview that routes cleanly to two real reference files with unambiguous selection logic. The only weakness is that the body carries no executable code itself, relying entirely on the references for concrete examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a compact routing table and short principle bullets with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching anchor 5. It is not 4 because there are no notable instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The reference-selection table gives a concrete, executable decision rule and points to reference files, matching anchor 4. It is not 5 because the body itself contains no copy-paste ready code (it lives in the references), and not 3 because the routing guidance is more concrete than high-level hints. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple routing skill, the single action (select the right reference by test type) is unambiguous via the table with a When-to-Use column, invoking the simple-skill exception for a 5. It is not 4 because the decision is fully unambiguous with no sequencing gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a well-signaled, one-level-deep reference table pointing to real files (references/frontend.md, references/e2e.md), matching anchor 5. It is not 4 because the references are exactly one level deep with no organization gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |