Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, one-level-deep router that delegates detail to two real reference files. Its weaknesses are mild redundancy with concepts Claude already knows and the absence of any executable guidance in the overview itself.
Suggestions
Compress the 'AAA Structure' and 'Common Principles' sections: state them as one-line project conventions and defer the definitions to references/frontend.md rather than re-explaining Arrange/Act/Assert.
Add a minimal copy-paste test skeleton (or deep-link to the relevant example section in each reference) so the overview is itself actionable instead of purely a router to the references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean overall, but the 'AAA Structure' breakdown ('Arrange: Set up preconditions...', 'Act: Execute the behavior under test') explains a concept Claude already knows and the 'Common Principles' repeat guidance present in references/frontend.md, so it could be tightened further. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The reference-selection table is concrete routing, but the body itself contains no executable code or commands and the principles ('Test names describe expected behavior') are abstract directives, landing between vague and copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple routing skill the single action — pick the right reference by test type via the table — is unambiguous and the content is clear and well-organized, which the simple-skills note allows to score 3 without an explicit multi-step workflow. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview table points to two well-signaled, one-level-deep references (references/frontend.md, references/e2e.md), both of which exist as substantive files, matching the anchor for clean split and easy navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |