typescript-rules

React/TypeScript frontend development rules including type safety, component design, state management, and error handling. Use when implementing React components, TypeScript code, or frontend features.

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

50%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A thorough, well-organized rules reference with strong concrete code examples, but it is a monolithic inline document that restates some known concepts and lacks explicit validation checkpoints in its workflows. Splitting detailed sections into referenced files and trimming obvious restatements would raise the score.

Suggestions

Trim restatements of concepts Claude already knows (e.g., "Function components only: Official React Recommendation", "Comments explain 'why'") to improve conciseness.

Add explicit validation/verification checkpoints with concrete commands to the refactoring "Implementation Procedure" (e.g., a build/test/verify step between Gradual Changes and Final Validation).

Move detailed reference material (e.g., the full Type Safety alternatives and Error Handling class catalog) into referenced files under references/ so SKILL.md stays a lean overview with one-level-deep links.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly dense and prescriptive, but ~210 lines include restatements of concepts Claude already knows ("Function components only: Official React Recommendation", "Comments explain 'why' (not 'what')") and could be tightened.	2 / 3
Actionability	Several copy-paste-ready executable snippets (type guard, Result type, AppError, immutable update, env config) anchor the score, but large portions (Basic Principles, Clean Code, Component Design, Refactoring) are abstract prescription without concrete code.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A procedure sequence exists ("Understand Current State → Gradual Changes → Behavior Verification → Final Validation") but validation checkpoints and feedback loops are implicit, and refactoring lacks a concrete verify step.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized with clear ## sections, but the document is a single ~210-line monolithic file with no bundle files or one-level-deep references to split out detailed material.	2 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, well-constructed description that states the skill's scope, enumerates concrete capability areas, and provides an explicit natural-language trigger. It answers both what and when without padding.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete domains — "type safety, component design, state management, and error handling" — rather than vague language, matching the anchor for several specific concrete items.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ("React/TypeScript frontend development rules including...") and when ("Use when implementing...") with an explicit trigger clause.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	"Use when implementing React components, TypeScript code, or frontend features" provides natural terms users would actually say, with good coverage of common phrasings.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Scoped to React/TypeScript frontend rules with distinct triggers, making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; "frontend features" is slightly generic but the React/TS niche is clear.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: shinpr/claude-code-workflows
Commit: 66e3b29

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.