CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

executing-plans

Coordinates batch execution of a written implementation plan by spawning implementer and reviewer teammates, executing tasks in batches with automated review gates, and pausing for human feedback between batches. Use when handed a plan file to execute, resuming plan work in a new session, or running a standalone plan outside the brainstorming flow. DO NOT TRIGGER for same-session execution after brainstorming — use kit:team-dev instead.

68

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

62%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill provides a well-structured orchestration workflow with clear sequencing and good validation checkpoints (automated review + human review gates). Its main weakness is the lack of concrete, executable examples — no sample messages, task lists, or report formats are shown, making it more of a process description than a hands-on guide. There is also moderate redundancy between the workflow steps and the 'Remember' summary section.

Suggestions

Add a concrete example of a SendMessage call to an implementer teammate and a sample review report format to make the skill more actionable

Remove or consolidate the 'Remember' section since it largely restates guidance already present in the workflow steps

Add an example of what a TaskList creation looks like based on a sample plan snippet

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Generally efficient but has some redundancy — the 'When to Stop' and 'When to Revisit' sections overlap conceptually, and the 'Remember' section largely restates points already made in the workflow steps. Some bullet points like 'Ask for clarification rather than guessing' are unnecessary for Claude.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides a clear step-by-step process with specific teammate roles and batch sizes, but lacks concrete examples — no sample SendMessage calls, no example TaskList creation, no example of what a report to the human should look like. The guidance is structural rather than executable.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 7-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (automated review gate at Step 4, human review at Step 5), feedback loops (Step 6 handles fixes and iteration), and clear stop conditions. The batch execution pattern with review gates is well-defined.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

References to other skills (kit:team-orchestration, kit:git-worktrees, kit:finish-branch, kit:writing-plans) are clearly listed in the Integration section, but there are no bundle files to support deeper content. The skill is somewhat monolithic — the 'When to Stop' and 'When to Revisit' sections could be more tightly integrated rather than separate sections.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates specific capabilities (batch execution, spawning teammates, review gates), provides explicit trigger conditions with a 'Use when' clause covering three scenarios, and proactively addresses potential conflicts with a related skill (kit:team-dev). The negative trigger is particularly valuable for disambiguation in a multi-skill environment.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'spawning implementer and reviewer teammates', 'executing tasks in batches with automated review gates', 'pausing for human feedback between batches'. These are detailed, actionable descriptions of what the skill does.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (coordinates batch execution by spawning teammates, executing with review gates, pausing for feedback) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with three specific trigger scenarios plus a negative trigger for disambiguation).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger terms users would say: 'plan file', 'execute', 'resuming plan work', 'new session', 'standalone plan', 'batch execution', 'implementation plan'. Also includes a negative trigger ('DO NOT TRIGGER for same-session execution after brainstorming') which helps disambiguation.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive with explicit negative trigger ('DO NOT TRIGGER for same-session execution after brainstorming — use kit:team-dev instead') that directly addresses the most likely conflict. The specific niche of batch plan execution with review gates in new/standalone sessions is clearly carved out.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
shousper/claude-kit
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.