CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

verify

Enforces fresh verification evidence before any completion or success claims. Use when about to say "done", "fixed", "tests pass", "build succeeds", or any synonym; before committing, creating PRs, or moving to the next task; before expressing satisfaction or positive statements about work state; and after agent delegation to independently verify results. Prevents unverified claims by requiring command execution, output inspection, and exit code confirmation.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable behavioral skill with a clear validated workflow and good organization. Its main weakness is redundancy — the same lesson is reinforced across several sections that could be consolidated to respect the token budget.

Suggestions

Merge "Why Partial Verification Fails" into the "What Counts as Evidence" table so each shortcut is shown once alongside its required evidence, eliminating the parallel restatement.

Collapse "Recognizing Unverified Claims" and the OK/BAD "Key Patterns" into a single compact examples block; the warning patterns and the good/bad examples currently duplicate the same guidance.

Trim "Why This Matters" (the 24-failure-memory list and motivational framing) to one or two lines, keeping the concrete cost statement without the anecdotal padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient but restates the same core message across four overlapping sections ("What Counts as Evidence", "Recognizing Unverified Claims", "Why Partial Verification Fails", "Key Patterns"), and "Why This Matters" adds motivational padding that could be trimmed.

2 / 3

Actionability

Gives a concrete 5-step procedure (Identify, Run, Read, Verify, Then claim) and an evidence table mapping each claim type to the specific proof required; as an instruction-only skill the actionable guidance is specific and complete.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequenced workflow with an explicit validation checkpoint and feedback loop ("If no: state actual status with evidence" / "If yes: state claim with evidence"), plus red-green guidance for regression tests.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Self-contained single-file skill with no bundle files and well-organized headed sections; per the simple-skills note, well-organized sections without external references earn full marks.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that clearly states both capability and trigger conditions with concrete actions and natural trigger terms. It is concise yet comprehensive and unlikely to conflict with other skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "Enforces fresh verification evidence" and "requiring command execution, output inspection, and exit code confirmation" — rather than vague language.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("Enforces fresh verification evidence before any completion or success claims") and when (a dedicated "Use when..." clause listing trigger situations).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural terms users would actually say — "done", "fixed", "tests pass", "build succeeds", "committing, creating PRs" — plus explicit synonym coverage.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (verification before completion claims) with distinct, specific triggers unlikely to overlap with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
shousper/claude-kit
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.