Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, actionable skill that provides a clear TDD-based planning workflow with concrete templates, exact commands, and validation checkpoints. Its main strengths are the precise task structure template and the explicit workflow with verification steps at each stage. Minor weaknesses include some redundancy between sections and a few lines of unnecessary flavor text that could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Trim flavor text like 'questionable taste' and 'assume they don't know good test design' — replace with the concrete implication (e.g., 'always include test commands and expected output').
Consider consolidating the 'Common Mistakes' section into the relevant template sections as inline comments or constraints to reduce redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Generally efficient but has some unnecessary verbosity. The 'assume they have questionable taste' and 'assume they don't know good test design' lines are flavor text that don't add actionable value. The 'Common Mistakes' section partially overlaps with the task structure section. However, most content earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Highly actionable with concrete task structure templates, exact markdown formatting, specific file path conventions, complete code examples in the task template, exact test commands with expected outputs, and a clear plan header template. Everything is copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is crystal clear: plan header → bite-sized tasks with TDD steps (write failing test → verify failure → implement → verify pass). Each step has explicit validation checkpoints with expected outcomes. The execution handoff at the end provides clear next-step options. The granularity guidance (2-5 minutes per step, max 8 steps per task) adds useful guardrails. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear sections (Overview, Task Structure, Common Mistakes, Execution Handoff), but everything is inline in a single file. For a skill of this length (~80 lines of meaningful content), this is acceptable but the references to external skills (kit:team-dev, brainstorming skill) could benefit from clearer signaling. No bundle files are provided despite references to other skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |