Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable planning template with explicit TDD sequencing, validation checkpoints, and concrete commands throughout. Organization is clear and self-contained with no unnecessary fluff.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: bullets and compact templates carry the instruction, it assumes developer competence ("DRY. YAGNI. TDD."), and it never pads with concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready templates with exact paths (`exact/path/to/file.py`), concrete commands (`pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`), and expected outputs, satisfying the fully-executable level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The TDD sequence (write failing test → verify fail → implement → verify pass) is explicitly ordered with validation checkpoints ("Expected: FAIL" / "Expected: PASS") and reinforced by "Common Mistakes" and "Remember" checklists. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with no external bundle references and clearly labeled sections (Overview, Granularity, Header, Task Structure, Remember, Common Mistakes, Execution Handoff) is well-organized with nothing nested. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |