Content
60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This instruction-only orchestration skill presents a clear, well-sequenced diagnostic workflow with concrete interview questions and named deliverables, and its single-file structure is easy to navigate. Its weaknesses are padding (a verbatim restated description and undefined slogans), missing executable detail (no artifact templates, an unexplained root registry, and a mismatched Italian-only example), and no validation step over the generated artifacts.
Suggestions
Remove the "## Description" section that restates the frontmatter verbatim, and either define or drop the "Estándar de Diamante" slogan to tighten conciseness.
Add concrete formats or short templates for tareas.md and plan_implementacion.md, and specify where the "registro raíz" of skills lives so squad mapping is executable.
Replace the Example section with a realistic Spanish-language exchange including a sample diagnostic output, and add a final validation step (e.g., confirm the artifacts against the interview answers before finishing).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient, but the "## Description" section restates the frontmatter verbatim, the first-person persona framing ("Soy el Arquitecto...") and the undefined "Estándar de Diamante" slogan add tokens without adding instruction. Not 4 because several sections could be trimmed; not 2 because there is no explanation of concepts Claude already knows and no heavy padding. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | There is concrete guidance — explicit interview questions and named artifacts (tareas.md, plan_implementacion.md) — but key details are missing: no format or template for either artifact, "Consulto el registro raíz" points to an unexplained registry, and the Example section shows only a user request (written in Italian, contradicting the mandatory-Spanish rule) with no example output. Not 4 because these gaps prevent mostly-executable guidance; not 2 because the interview questions and deliverable names are specific, not high-level hints. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The bifurcated workflow is clearly sequenced (detect empty folder vs. existing code → scenario A/B → interview → squad sync → generate artifacts) with an explicit checkpoint ("Entrego una breve 'Prescripción Técnica' antes de proceder") and a wait-for-answers gate before materialization. Not 5 because there is no validation step for the generated artifacts and the squad-registry lookup is undefined; not 3 because checkpoints are explicit rather than missing or implicit, and the operations are not destructive or batch. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single self-contained file with well-organized, clearly-headed sections and no nested or buried references (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories exist). Not 5 because the structure is section organization only — artifact templates and the squad registry that could live in one-level-deep reference files are absent rather than well-signaled; not 3 because nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined and navigation is easy. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |